A man had two sons. He came to the first and said, 'Son, go out and work in the vineyard today.' He said in reply, 'I will not,' but afterwards changed his mind and went. The man came to the other son and gave the same order. He said in reply, 'Yes, sir,' but did not go.
Matthew 21:28-32
The meaning of this parable is pretty clear - neither of these sons are
much to brag about! One told his father that he wouldn't obey and then changed
his mind and did obey. The other pretended to obey his father and then didn't!
This parable explains clearly why Jesus was always hanging out with
riff-raff and ended up at odds with the religious establishment of his day.
Those in the religious establishment pretended to say "yes" to God,
but actually said "no." The riff-raff appeared to say "no"
to God, but ended up saying "yes."
In the religious establishment of his day, Jesus had a terrible
reputation! He talked so much about eating and drinking and accepted so many
dinner invitations, even from public sinners and religious outcasts, that he
earned the nicknames of “glutton,” “drunkard” and “friend of sinners!” As the
gospels put it, the religious leaders were so shocked by the huge number of
rejects and sinners who were hanging around Jesus that they “murmured” out
loud, “This man welcomes sinners and even eats with them!” The religious
establishment appeared to love God through external conformity, but in their
hearts were as mean as snakes. They represented the son who said "yes, but
didn't go into his father's vineyard. The rejects and sinners were the one who
welcomed Jesus' teaching and followed him wherever he went! The religious
outcasts represented the son who said he wouldn't go work in their father's
vineyard, but ended up going!
This parable explains so much about why Jesus called religious leaders
fakes, phonies and frauds. They were the ones who loved to parade around in all
their religious regalia putting on airs about how religious they were, but
underneath all of that they were rotten to the core, using and abusing people's
trust and good will for their own benefit. These people represented the son who
said he would go work in their father's vineyard, but ended up not going!
As a priest, I have always seen both of these two groups at work in the
church. I am proud to report that I have always gravitated toward those who
said they wouldn't go, but did go rather than
those who said they would go, but didn't go.
I have always trusted honest doubters more than convinced fanatics.
I have always been turned off by pietistic, arrogant, religious
know-it-alls. They get on my nerves big time! On the other hand, I have always
been attracted to the honest doubt of those who have serious problems with
organized religion, especially those who have been hurt by the condemnation and
rejection of religious conformists. I identify more with honest doubters than
arrogant, sanctimonious super-convinced religious fanatics.
Just as in Jesus' day, there are two very common classes of religious people
in the world. First, there are those whose profession is much better than their
practice. They make great protestations of piety and fidelity. but their
practice lags far behind. A few of them are very much wrapped up in today's so-called
“Christian Nationalism” movement. They like to claim the high road of Christian
morality, but "like wolves in sheep's clothing" they are more than willing to engage in some obviously un-Christian
behaviors! It was about them that Gandhi famously said, "I like your
Christ, but I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your
Christ."
Second, just as in Jesus' day, there are those who profess to
have no interest in the Church and in religion, and yet, when it comes right
down to it, they live more Christian lives than many professing Christians.
They like to sound like tough hard-headed materialists, even agnostics, but
sometimes they are found to be doing kindly and generous things, almost in
secret. I have met many of them. I am friends with many of them. I have been
amazed by many of them.
The key to really understanding this parable is that neither son was the
kind of son to bring full joy to his father because both were unsatisfactory.
The ideal son would be the one who accepted his father's orders with obedience
and respect and who unquestioningly and fully carried them out. The ideal
disciple is the one who both professes faith and "puts his money where his
mouth is!" The ideal disciple is the one who, "if he were to be
accused of being a Christian, there would be enough evidence to convict
him."
The ideal disciple is the one in whom profession and practice meet and
match! (repeat last line for emphasis). As Jesus said, “Not everyone who says,
‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the ones who do the
will of my Father who is in heaven."