THOUGHTS ON THE PRACTICE OF INFANT BAPTISM
Some Things to Remember
INFANT BAPTISM AS A CONSISTENT TRADITION IN THE CHURCH
The practice of infant baptism has been a consistent
tradition in the Church, both in the East and in the West, since the very
beginning. It was seriously challenged during the Protestant Revolt of the 16th
century when the practice of adult or "believer baptism" only was adopted @400
years ago.
The Scriptures were written at a time when adult Jews and Gentiles were being converted to Christianity, but there are several passages where “whole households” were baptized: Stephanas, Cornelius, Lydia and the Philippian jailer stories are cases in point. The language of the New Testament is Greek and the word used when “whole households” were baptized is oikos which has traditionally included infants. There are no examples in secular or Biblical Greek of the words being used which would restrict its meaning only to adults.
Here are examples of
what early Christian writers had to say on the subject of the infant baptism. Notice that the first example was 1,800 years ago and the last one 1,600 years ago:
Hippolytus
“Baptize first the children (then the men and then the women), and if they can speak for themselves let them do so. Otherwise, let their parents or other relatives speak for them” (The Apostolic Tradition 21:16 [A.D. 215]).
“The Church received
from the apostles the tradition of giving baptism even to infants. The
apostles, to whom were committed the secrets of the divine sacraments, knew
there are in everyone innate strains of [original] sin, which must be washed
away through water and the Spirit” (Commentaries on Romans 5:9 [A.D. 248]).
Gregory of Nazianz
“Do you have an infant
child? Allow sin no opportunity; rather, let the infant be sanctified from
childhood. From his most tender age let him be consecrated by the Spirit. Do
you fear the seal [of baptism] because of the weakness of nature? Oh, what a
pusillanimous mother and of how little faith!” (Oration on Holy
Baptism 40:7 [A.D. 388]).
“‘Well enough,’ some
will say, ‘for those who ask for baptism, but what do you have to say about
those who are still children, and aware neither of loss nor of grace? Shall we
baptize them too?’ Certainly [I respond], if there is any pressing danger.
Better that they be sanctified unaware, than that they depart unsealed and
uninitiated” (ibid., 40:28).
John Chrysostom
“You see how many are
the benefits of baptism, and some think its heavenly grace consists only in the
remission of sins, but we have enumerated ten honors [it bestows]! For this reason
we baptize even infants, though they are not defiled by [personal] sins, so
that there may be given to them holiness, righteousness, adoption, inheritance,
brotherhood with Christ, and that they may be his [Christ’s] members” (Baptismal
Catecheses in Augustine, Against Julian 1:6:21 [A.D. 388]).
Augustine
“The custom of Mother
Church in baptizing infants is certainly not to be scorned, nor is it to be
regarded in any way as superfluous, nor is it to be believed that its tradition
is anything except apostolic” (The Literal Interpretation of Genesis 10:23:39
[A.D. 408]).
No comments:
Post a Comment