Are you saved? Have you been
“born again?’ Have you accepted Jesus as your Lord and Savior? If you really
want to make a Catholic squirm and sweat and doubt their religious upbringing,
just corner one and rattle off that set of questions!
When I worked in the Bible
Belt, down in the southern part of the state, Catholics, including myself, were
often bombarded with those questions. More than one Catholic was left confused
and bewildered. Their counterparts could date the precise hour they were
“saved,” while Catholics stood there puzzled and confused.
Today’s gospel gives us a
perfect opportunity to talk about these questions. To be “born again,” does one
have to have dramatic, certain and dated experience or can one grow
toward God in an extended process, sometimes without a clear beginning and end?
Many of our
fundamentalist brothers and sisters look to the Apostle Paul as their hero and
ideal. His conversion experience was dramatic and decisive. It was a
shattering, clearly memorable confrontation with the person of Christ on the
road to Damascus when he was on his way to hunt down Christians and kill them.
After this dramatic u-turn in his life, he fanatically embraced and defended
what he had recently persecuted and attacked. His conversion experience was so
dramatic that the story is retold three times in the Acts of the Apostles and
referred to three more times in various New Testament Letters.
Paul’s emphasis on
personal-individual faith, his emphasis on a dateable dramatic decision and
evangelistic zeal have become the prototype and model of Christian conversion,
especially for fundamentalist groups.
Roman Catholics, while
respecting Paul’s experience, look to the Apostle Peter as their hero and
model. Peter’s experience was very different. In one gospel passage,
Peter does in fact make his profession of faith, but like many of us, it is the
climax of a long and gradual insight into who Jesus was.
Even though some would like
to suggest that everybody has to have a definite conversion experience that
can be dated, the New Testament does not suggest a single stereotype for an
authentic Christian conversion experience. Nicodemus, for example, who
triggered the discussion with Jesus about what it means to be “born again” is
an ambiguous illustration of conversion. We do not know whether Jesus persuaded
Nicodemus or not. All we know is that he turned up to help out at the
burial.
Roman Catholics have often
dismissed as silly emotionalism the dramatic and decisive conversions of
fundamentalists, while fundamentalists have often dismissed the long and
gradual conversions of Catholic believers. The fact is, the church has always
welcomed both kinds of conversion experiences.
No comments:
Post a Comment